"A hundred years from now, this must not be
remembered as an age rich in possessions and poor in ideals.
"Instead, we must usher in an era of
responsibility.
"My generation tested
limits -- and our country, in some ways, is better for it.
"Women are now treated more equally.
"Racial
progress has been steady, if still too slow.
"We are learning to protect the
natural world around us.
"We will continue his progress, and we will not turn
back. At times, we lost our way. But we
are coming home....
"We have discovered that who we are is more important than
what we have.
"And we know we must renew our values to restore our country.
"This is the vision of America's
founders.
"They never saw our nation's
greatness in rising wealth or advancing armies, but in small,
unnumbered acts of
caring and courage and self-denial.
"Their highest hope, as Robert Frost described it, was 'to
occupy the
land with character.'
"And that, 13
generations later, is still our goal ... to occupy the land with
character.
"In a responsibility era,
each of us has important tasks -- work that only we can do.
"Each of us is responsible ... to love and
guide our children, and help a neighbor in need.
"Synagogues, churches and mosques are responsible ... not only
to
worship but to serve.
"Corporations are
responsible ... to treat their workers fairly, and leave the air and
waters
clean.
"Our nation's leaders are
responsible ... to confront problems, not pass them on to others.
"And to lead this nation to a responsibility
era, a president himself must be responsible."
- from George
W. Bush, 2000 acceptance
speech.
That
quote looks like the basis for an indictment to me.
Robert’s Confirmation Minuet - Robert’s confirmation hearings are underway. Democrats must present their view of the Constitution as a document that must respond to societal changes. We must find ways to deal with 21st century issues using 18th century language. Strict constructionism dooms us to a stagnant society out of tune with the times and the world.
Privatization May Still Arise like a Phoenix - A scheme is being discussed that would involve writing two versions of Social Security legislation. The House version would include a form of privatization and the Senate bill would not. The idea is that the conference committee would then adopt the House bill. This is a procedural gambit that would be hard to stop. Let’s keep our eyes open and raise Cain when it appears.